Could THIS be the same person?

Ok, how about this one that I JUST discovered.

Amy, at 17



Amy, age progressed to age 46





(2003 - When site's up, there's a pic there)


Ok, check THIS out:
Unknown White Female


Details:
Unidentified White Female Discovered on December 20, 1987 on 130th Avenue, north of Orange Boulevard, in Royal Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida.
The victim may have been at this location for a period of three months to possibly three years before discovery.

Vital Statistics

• Estimated age: 20 - 40 years old
  
• Approximate Height and Weight: 5\'1 - 5\'6\"; 90 - 130 pounds
  
• Distinguishing Characteristics: Light brown hair with streaks of grey.
  
• She was short with a small frame.
  
• She may have suffered a back injury or had severe arthritis. Fracture of the right clavicle.
  
• Dentals: The victim had extensive dental work and dental records are available. 8 fillings and extensive carries.
  
• Clothing: No clothing or jewelry was found with the victim.

Think about these clues that I have very carefully considered:
- Taken care of initially, dentally.
- Back and/or clavicle injury/arthritis (From a fall or three off of a bike OR merely riding on one for days/years at a time?)
- People under stress and/or drugs/alcohol and/or lenthy abuse (as biker-slaves commonly are) could possibly grey prematurely (before age 30)
- Surgery scar on Amy's abdomen would have not been visible on skeletal remains
- Age of discovery, 20-40 ... Amy\'s age at the time this body was discovered, -=30=- ...

Let's compare our apple and our orange; are they BOTH apples?

wrote ...
Amy's Vital Statistics

• Date Of Birth: January 9, 1957
  
• Age at Time of Disappearance: 17 years old
  
• Height and Weight at Time of Disappearance: 5\'5, 110 pounds
  
• Distinguishing Characteristics: White female. Brown wavy hair; brown eyes.
  
• Marks, Scars: Scar on abdomen
  
• Clothing: A short blue denim skirt and cork platform sandals

Lastly, forget the fact that they think she's older; look at the chins between the two. Cheeks are fleshy, and in skeletal remains they've no real way to tell how full they were, however, the nose bridge is VERY similiar, as are the chin, the neck, and all other generalized features. Remember, the MOUTH is fleshy, thus, it's also speculated as smaller in the reconstruction, however, it just might not really be the actual case. The eyes would also follow suit, as is the orbital region foregrounded to the cavity itself, so the eyes wouldn\'t necessarily match perfectly either in the 'model' shown above.

I'm also not sure I read correctly about Amy's not requiring a lot of dental work in her youth. I think maybe it only said major dental was never done, which may or may not explain why dental records were not conclusively determined as a cross-casing conclusive.
Ok, let's look at something else here that's of interest. Let's say that she WAS there for the "3 years" previous to discovery; this puts Amy at 26 to 27. If you read some of the (conflicting, yet only) depositions of the "witnesses" you can see that the last "known" sighting of her (or so it would lead one to believe by the testimony of the one that "owned" her for a few years and then "traded" her) could place her to about the age of 25-27 even though his dating in his final death-bed "memoirs" was said not to pan out. This, if taken only with these as a loose clues, can put her within the warmer climates (as a biker would migrate to to continue comfortably riding his only means of transportation) and possibly in Florida (where she was initially born and raised) at this timeframe (even as the possibility of the body only being there the minimum time stated as 3 months, at November/December minus 3 months, equalling around August/September which, in fact, would account for the possible "speedy" decomposition of the body due to extreme temperatures here in Florida during those months of the year). So, logically, all of these factors can fit in time-wise, conditionally, and within the timeline established from the loose deposition of one of the only known, yet not truly credible, witnesses to her even existing after her unfortunate disappearance. It just adds up to the majority of what is "known" (if though it's not truly known, but presented) to logically and chronologically fit the pieces of the puzzle; the body that is a close resemblance as the final piece of this puzzle.

Am I completely nuts, or am I thinking correctly about this? I'm going to keep pressing about this, and I'm going to see if I can find more information out about this mystery person.

Once again, before I die I SWEAR I'm gonna solve a big missing person's case; I'm determined now.

That's the case of the 17 year old beauty pageant winner/aspiring actress who became paranoid and violent after attending a wrap party for Spring Break, in which she had a bit part. She thought people were trying to kill her, and at one point she said something about seeing "something terrible" that involved money laundering. (Later, many arrests were made in her area for money laundering. If I had to guess, I'd say she walked in on a suspected stoolie being persuaded of the error of his ways....That might have involved a beating, mutilation, or even murder, though no proof of that has ever been found.) In any case, after months of increasingly erratic and even violent behavior, she went out on a ride with her boyfriend, they argue, she gets out of the car barefoot and walks away, and has never been seen again.

'Here, let me help you out a bit here, people ...

Let's look at them CLOSELY and adjusted to facing the same direction:





Look at the middle two and think about all I said above ...
... it's what makes me think I've got a hit here.

Brooke STILL doesn't see it, however ...

Although its reported on some sites that Amy Billig had perfect teeth, that has been refuted on other sites. Amy did not have major dental work done but there was some. Also, it was on her top front teeth.