3e07139214="AspHole" wrote ... *hugs meg* But we love you!
Exactly Meg, I never doubted your abilities to do the job, I know you and knew you would do a great job, it just wasn't fair to others, that's why I turned him down when he wanted me to, I thought Rach or Jenn, Beck, and many others would do a good job too and they had been there so much longer.
**COUGHS**
...anyway... The Bored board has been sooo boring lately.
Joined: Wed Jan 12 2005, 12:39pm
Location: Plague of Madness
Posts: 1100
Correction again:
I thought Rach, Jenn, Beck, Hayley or Sesk and many others would do a good job too and they had been there so much longer. And I didn't know Aspy well then, but now, I would say Aspy as well, is that everybody? heh :wink:
Look Arcane. just because Pat refused to go behind the back of his best friend and have an online relationship with you doesn't give you call to be a bitch. It says more about you than him that you wanted to carry on with two young guys behind your partner's back. I think you'll find that it was YOU who over-reacted to Pat's comment on his board when he pointed out that you don't really know him, which you don't and neither does Meg as niether of you have ever met him. This online thing is ok for lonely people who need distractions, and are unhappy in their lives, but it will NEVER replace REAL LIFE people...You just have to look at the archives and how you all bitch to and about each other clearly illustrates.
Brooke and Dave have met him, but he was depressed at that time, and everyone knows how this can change people. I doubt they would have got on when he was not depresssed from what I have seeen as they seem to have a very different outlook on life and vastly different politics and social values...
Meg was never his girlfriend she told him she loved him...That's her problem. If she thinks he's pimply and cross-eyed..how desperate must she have been to write to him so often (boring letters which I have read, BTW ending "in short, I love you")?
He asked her to stop calling and she tried to change his mind and he stuck fast..She needs to get over it. Obviously, being so young she is struggling with rejection..I can understand that. But it doesn't give her call to insult the guy she ran after and lied about her age to in a sad attempt to get him to go out with her...Admittedly he should have been more firm with her but Pat doesn't like hurtimg people's feelings and Meg, who although 16 has A LOT of sexual experience; far more than Pat at 20, took advantage of this. He has learned who he can and cannot trust here and you have ploaced yourself firmly in the NOT category by the posts you have made.
I hope Tony appreciates that his best friend valued his feelings over the chance of cheap online thrills with a woman old enough to know better. And I did not meet Pat online, so that's only 2 online relationships. He's had, if you count Melissa as his "relationship" with Meg was all in Meg's head and in a custom title he gave away to anyone who gave him attention when he was feeling down. I adopted the title to highlight the irony of it..not to be 3rd holder of this title ( like it means anything, lol) as you would so have liked...
Arcane, it's puzzling that you should take what I said on my board as such a scathing remark. All I said was that you don't know me well enough to state that I'm always in love and such. I didn't say it in a nasty way and as I recall I also said that I appreciated your sentiments, the ones that were true.
As for everything else, yes I have suffered in the past from depression and lonliness and to an extent I did reach out to people on the internet for companionship. I'm also aware that in the past this led to a certain shallowness in character from me that made me act in a way that wasn't really true to myself.
As for "online relationships" I want to point out that I was never in an online relationship with Meg, no matter if she believed we were. She was the one who always called me, I never called her and a custom title is a string of text. The fact that other people who have seemed to be in a relationship with me in the past have also had this string of text associated with their username for a period of time would seem to suggest otherwise, IF relationships and suchlike were governed by such things as custom titles. The fact is that at the end of the day custom titles are irrelevent. Meg was never my gf. The fact that she comes out now and calls me things like "pimply" and "cross eyed" just goes to show her true nature. The fact is that I do not find her attractive and she is most certainly not the type of person I would ever go out with. Her previous outburst and the fact that she lied about her age goes to show that. She may have found me "pimply" and "cross eyed" but it didn't stop her from calling me all hours and telling me that she loved me on the phone and in letters (which can be scanned and posted). The only reason I ever replied in kind to this is out of embarrasment and not knowing how to get out of such a situation without hurting feelings.
And now for my retort, Meg is shallow, dull, vain and banal (which came through in the phone calls and letters. I never called her and replied to letters only out of courtesy). It is interesting that she only attacks me now when it seems she is passed over for a woman 20 years older (and one I actually find attractive and intelligent). My regret is that I was too wary of treading on the feelings of others to stop having anything to do with her a long time ago.
The reason she was made a mod on TBB was that I was practicing a little Roman "bread and circuses". It is ridiculous that people harp on about experience and skills when talking about moderators on a discussion forum. They are not needed.
Joined: Wed Jan 12 2005, 12:39pm
Location: Plague of Madness
Posts: 1100
Here we go, more twisted truth and lies about someone you don't even know and have never spoken to.....Pat and I were both attracted when we first met, but neither of us really knew each other and once we did, it faded quickly as far as I know. If he had issues past that point, I am oblivious to them. If I had wanted a relationship with him, I would have given him my address when he was in FL and that would have been that, but I did not. If you want to call cyber a relationship, well, that again, is your delusion, we were only having fun as far as I was concerned and I never did anything behind my former bf's back, he read all convos and knew all. When Tony and I started cyberring a lot, Chris and I were over and Tony knew I cyberred others as I knew he did, plus Tony and I never had a formal restrictive relationship, I like him too much for that as a friend, I felt he was spending too much time online instead of seeking out girls IRL to date. And again, if you call cyber a relationship, then Pat did betray him and is lying to you, not a quick learner are you? Whatever the case, my problem is not with you, or wasn't, it is with Pat and his continual betrayal of not only my friendship, but of many people's and he will have to deal with these mistakes long after you are gone.
So let's recount, every girl, and we are up to 5 now, that has a problem with the asinine way Pat is acting is doing so because we all have some deep seeded desire to fuck his brains out and are jealous of a fat, old, narrow minded, narcissistic, low class skank who likes to deceive herself into thinking she is better than everyone else? Time for a reality check, everyone here, girls and guys, have a problem with Pat because of his actions, because he is a disloyal, backstabbing sorry excuse for what a friend should be, this and no other reason. I was the one that urged Pat to go out and get into real life, same as I did Tony, even suggesting he go to a goth club because goth girls do find geeks attractive. If I wanted Pat, why would I urge him to get a real life outside of the internet? Now I even feel guilty for playing any part in getting him involved with an obviously obsessed person with apparent mental issues.
Pat, I already quoted what I said exactly and I know you more than well enough to have said that....you are mushy in love, it's a fact anyone can see by reading your posts concerning this woman.
And to be honest here, without the anger....we are all saddened by this whole event, I know I am, I thought of Pat as a good friend, but he has proven otherwise.
Well Arcane. How the worm turns! I believe you want to be a teacher? You'll need to control your anger in that case. Pat has never cybered with you and I should know I've read the convos he kept where he turned you down...oops sorry..wasn't I supposed to mention that? lol
You have resorted to personal insults that I will not stoop to AS IT REVEALS MORE ABOUT YOU THAN IT DOES ME AS YOU DO NOT KNOW ME.
Pat was NEVER attracted to you, in fact I think you'll find he was replulsed but you'd know more about that!!!! And if you were initially attracted to him..why do you now call him cross eyed? Perhaps because your advances were rejected? It seems to me that if you find someone physically attractive that will not wane for any reason other than theem changing physically...Unless you are unstable and fickle, anger at rejection can be your only true motive...
Pat pandered to online whores as he needed attention... Something he does not need off you now whuch is why you are redundant in his life. He was A 19yr old boy who only ever had one mediocre fuck buddy..who can blame him? It's perfectly natural at that age to take what comes...What's your excuse? What's most tellling is that he never let it go beyond that. We're in a stable and lasting relationship..despite online attempts to come between us and this obviously bothers you a lot....You offered him your address and he declined and would not give you his...that's what happened and you know this, so why attempt to lie?
As for mental problems..read your own post. You have all been talkiing for two months about people who, until today have not posted on here in all that time. How sane is that? I'll not get into cybering with anyone other than your partner, with or without his permission...I don't feel that is totally stable either though.
You seem very quick to anger which is also unstable, as do most of the people on this board.
Mine and Pat's responses today are reasoned and factual.... your's are mere rants. You claim to speak for EVERYONE...here and in the other thread. Even online on an assanine board like this, I would think that people have minds of their own and cannot jugde whether they like people via a modem, as we all know it is impossible, if not undesirable to convey one's true character through such a limited medium. you asked me to crawl back into slime on the other thread (I cannot be bothered to respond to you twice) I live in a very nice little house thank you and have a very nice little life and I do not run boards which encourage minors to engage in underage exual role play as I believe you do....I think that is far more immoral than anything you may accuse me of.
Please lady (used for effect not accuracy..) Leave it out..You were rejected...Deal with it and go find the next minor you'd like to seduce online if that what makes you happy. Each to their own! Be happy.....
